 |
GRAVITY
CONTROL AND
WARP DRIVE FOR SPACE TRAVEL
NASA
CONCEPT OF AN ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY (1G) SPACESHIP
GO
...
GENERAL RELATIVITY THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
GO
...
GRAVITATIONAL WARP DRIVE FOR SPACE TRAVEL
GO
...
EFFECTS OF DARK ENERGY ON COSMOLOGY
GO
...
GRAVITY AND CURVATURE OF SPACETIME
GO
...
TEST FOR FLATNESS OF
SPACETIME
GO
...
HOW TO
DETERMINE, E = MC2
GO
...
SPACETIME
CURVATURE
GO
...
RESULTS
TO DATE
GO
...
| MAIN PAGE |
PRODUCTS
| CONSULTING |
MISSION
| RESUME |
Copyright © 1999-2011 John Cipolla/AeroRocket. All rights
reserved |
|
(1) GRAVITATIONAL WARP DRIVE FOR SPACE TRAVEL
TOP
John
Cipolla is performing unique research in the area of gravitational
warp drive
technology and gravity control for faster than light star travel. The
illustrations below show a spacecraft being accelerated
while enclosed within an artificially generated warp bubble.
The following results from
the theory of General Relativity illustrate how
a warp bubble uses opposing regions of expanding
and contracting spacetime for propelling a starship at velocities exceeding
the speed of light. This is a work in progress based on
a new method for warping spacetime to generate
warp bubble disturbances without the need for exotic
matter or negative energy. Experiments are being
conducted to evaluate the method's capability for generating the theoretical warp metrics depicted in
Figure-2, Figure-3 and Figure-4. |

Figure-1: Warp bubble traveling
adjacent to the Earth (not to scale)

Figure-2: Warp bubble geometry illustrating
how spacetime compression and expansion
propel a warp bubble and an enclosed starship through space to
distant stars

Figure-3 and Figure-4: Warp metrics generated using frame
dragging.
Starship is located on the flat part of a warp bubble
disturbance
THEORETICAL WARP DRIVE ANALYSIS (10/15/2008)

Figure-5, Figure-6 and Figure-7: Theoretical
warp metric derivation using MathCAD
|
MathCAD results for the
Relativistic analysis of the Alcubierre
faster than light
warp metric is illustrated in the above contour plots. Figure-5 represents a light cone
where rs(t) = [(x-xs(t))2 + y2
+ z2]1/2. Figure-6 represents the metric-shape function, f(rs) also called the "top hat"
function. Figure-7 displays the resulting warp
metric for faster than light space travel. The complete MathCAD
analysis to determine the relativistic warp metric for faster than light star
travel is presented below ... |

--- End Warp Drive Analysis ---
GENERAL RELATIVITY AND WARP DRIVE THEORY
This Relativistic Warp drive theory uses the
concept of a warp bubble to avoid violating the
universal speed limitation which is the speed of light, c.
Basic to the study of General Relativity is the concept of spacetime curvature embodied by the following
statement, "Matter-energy tells spacetime how to curve and spacetime tells
matter-energy how to move". The concept of spacetime curvature
is summarized in the Einstein equation which is a result of
the theory of General Relativity.
According
to the Einstein equation, matter and energy tell spacetime
how to curve and in turn spacetime tells matter and energy
how to move. Where, matter and energy are defined by the
stress-energy tensor (T) and spacetime curvature is defined
by the Riemann curvature tensor (R). In summation, the
Einstein equation relates spacetime curvature and
accelerated motion of a matter-energy system and the
implication that accelerated motion and the effects of
gravity are not distinguishable. Hence, artificial gravity
can be created by simply rotating a spacecraft to create the
effect of gravity on long journeys into space and a warp
bubble can be used to travel to distant places at many times
the speed of light without locally exceeding the speed of light
in the warp bubble.
WARP BUBBLE PHYSICS
According to General Relativity gravity and acceleration are not
distinguishable and are caused by the curvature or warp metric of
spacetime.
A warp bubble is a specific warp metric solution of General
Relativity and is a combination of positive and negative energy
fields that pushes and pulls our starship forward to bring our
destination to us just like a conveyer belt. The exotic ingredient required to make a warp
bubble is negative energy which has the unusual property of
being able to make ordinary matter fall up in a gravitational
field. According to General
Relativity the spacetime in front of a warp bubble is
compressed pulling our destination to us. At the same time the spacetime behind a warp bubble is expanding pushing us to our
destination. The compression and expansion process happens in an instant and at many times
the speed of light making faster than light travel possible. The
combination of positive and negative energy produces an
expansion of space behind the bubble and a contraction of space
in front of the bubble. in other words, creating space behind the bubble pushes us to our destination
and destroying space in front of the bubble pulls us to our destination.
This mechanism allows us to travel many times faster than the
speed of light (see Starship Warp Velocity) relative to the
Earth without exceeding the speed of light in our local frame of
reference, the warp bubble.
The warp bubble itself is made of fields of positive energy at
either end and a band of negative energy around the middle.
These energy fields create huge gravitational effects so powerful the
warp bubble can distort spacetime without having to accelerate
the traveler to achieve faster than light velocity. The main requirement,
negative energy also called vacuum energy is a property of a vacuum where subatomic
particles smaller than an atom dart into and out of existence
almost instantaneously. According to the rules of quantum mechanics
negative energy creates a negative quantum pressure that
propels the warp bubble and therefore our starship forward. An
interesting observation is that we may already see the effects
of negative energy because astronomers have observed that our
universe is expanding due to the presence of dark energy. It is
theorized that dark energy fills the vacuum of space between the
galaxies and is the cause for the expansion and increasing
acceleration of the universe.
Therefore, dark energy and negative energy are probably the same
"stuff" required to make a warp bubble possible.
General Relativity states the equivalent mass-energy of a planet
the size of Jupiter is required to create a warp bubble. Because
producing negative energy is beyond our capability the objective
of this research is to find an alternate way to create a
relativistic warp bubble without the need for exotic matter or negative
energy. It is proposed that a replacement for negative energy
may be possible by using positive energy in unique ways to generate an energy signature
equivalent to the Alcubierre warp metric displayed in
Figure-11 of the
RESULTS TO DATE
section.
SPECIAL REFERENCES:
Note-1: 2-D warp bubble from John
Cipolla's Warp Drive Notes, 1974.
Note-2: Negative energy composite view based on Sci Fi
Science, How to Explore the Universe: Where Dr Michio
Kaku reveals how we could one day build a warp drive.
Note-3: Sci Fi Science video, warp theory:
Traveling at Warp Speed
Note-4: Sci Fi Science video, starship design:
Exploring the Universe using the Warp Drive

Figure-8: MathCAD
warp bubble analysis of a hypothetical flight to a star 4.3 light years away
REFERENCES FOR
GENERAL RELATIVITY
Gravitation, Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne and John
A. Wheeler
SPACETIME and GEOMETRY An Introduction to General
Relativity, Sean M. Carroll
Relativity Demystified, David McMahon
WARP DRIVE
REFERENCES
The
Warp Drive: Hyper-fast Travel Within General Relativity,
Miguel Alcubierre
Breakthrough Propulsion Physics (NASA)
Warp Drive, When? (NASA)
Back to TOP |
WARP METRIC TEST RESULTS
TOP

Figure-9, Figure-10 and Figure-11: Experimental and theoretical warp metrics
|
These results compare
the warp signature of spacetime generated using frame dragging
as displayed in Figure-3 and Figure-4 to the warp signature
of the Alcubierre warp metric
displayed in Figure-11. Work continues using a laser to map
spacetime around the experimental warp metric, clocks
to measure time dilation within and around the warp
bubble and force measurements to determine inertia effects. |
LASER SPACETIME WARP EXPERIMENT
(2/12/2009)

Figure-12: Laser spacetime warp
experiment
|
Laser
experiment used to map spacetime around the
proposed warp drive demonstration device. This laser
measurement system is mechanically and acoustically isolated
from the system used to warp spacetime. Similar experiments
are being designed using synchronized clocks to measure time
dilation effects. No positive results to date. |
LASER SPACETIME WARP EXPERIMENT (8/12/2009)

Figure-13: Laser spacetime warp
experiment using fog
|
The same experiment
using fog to trace a laser beam around the warp
bubble disturbance. The laser beam was not deflected
indicating spacetime is not being warped to any
measurable degree by the proposed warp generator. Several
configurations of the warp generator resulted in the same
null result. The experiments are continuing using
conventional energy sources to affect spacetime...
|
|
DISCUSSION (02/15/2010): The aim of these experiments
is an attempt to
show that a warp bubble may be generated using
electromagnetic energy instead of negative energy as required by Alcubierre's
faster than light warp metric. The method proposed here to warp spacetime
theoretically generates a warp bubble (Figure-3) that
superficially matches the signature warp bubble (Figure-1) predicted using negative energy.
General Relativity, Dark Matter and Dark
Energy cosmology indicate that a warp bubble is analogous to
expanding spacetime observed to occur between distant
galaxies. In
effect, expanding spacetime between galaxies is like a
conveyer belt pushing galaxies apart at a rate of approximately
71 km/sec/mega parsec. While measuring the warp effect
predicted by this method has not proven successful the paper
by Alcubierre states the following, "The need for exotic
matter therefore doesn't necessarily eliminate the
possibility of using spacetime distortion like the one
described here for hyper-fast interstellar travel."
|
|
INERTIAL MASS REDUCTION EXPERIMENT (7/21/2011)

Figure-14: Warp chamber shown
rotating at 1720 RPM
|
This
experiment is an attempt to determine if the inertial
mass
of a 15.5 gram cylindrical aluminum object is reduced within
a proposed gravitational warp bubble. The warp
chamber illustrated in Figure-14 is composed of a ring of
six ceramic magnets that rotate at 1720 RPM. Experiments
conducted using the force balance system illustrated in
Figure-14 has so far not detected any measurable reduction
in the weight or inertial mass of the cylindrical aluminum object. These
experiments will continue using improved force measurement
devices and various orientations as these valuable resources become available ...
The theoretical basis for the
operation of this experiment is that a massive object causes
space-time to curve and in-turn space-time tells a
massive object how to move and accelerate.
It is postulated
here that space-time curvature can be modified
using powerful electromagnetic fields
to reduce the inertial mass of a starship. In the
weakest implementation of this theory a starship can be made
to accelerate as if the inertial mass of the starship were
reduced making near light speed possible using simple
electric thrusters. However, in the most advanced
implementation of this experiment when the energy of the
electromagnetic fields cause the inertial mass of a starship
to become imaginary the starship in the warp
bubble will become a tachyon capable of moving
faster than the speed of light. In its advanced form the
object in the warp bubble is isolated from the rest of the
universe allowing the warp bubble to become a local fame of
reference where Faster Than Light (FTL) travel does
not violate the local speed of light (c).
Tachyon: A particle postulated to move at a velocity
greater than the speed of electromagnetic radiation, such
that as the particle accelerates it loses energy. Of the two
properties rest mass and energy, one must be
real and the other imaginary. If a tachyon
exists it may be detected through the emission of
Cerenkov radiation (a kind of electromagnetic shock wave) or by cosmic
ray collisions. |
TESTS AND
ANALYSES TO BETTER UNDERSTAND GRAVITY
GRAVITATIONAL WAVES (8/9/2011)

Figure-15: Experiment to determine
magnetic force (F) verses
distance (r) separating a magnet from a small
cylindrical steel mass
and to prove magnetic forces obey the inverse square law
relationship.

Figure-16: Test results (red
dots) verses an inverse square law curve fit for magnetic
force verses distance.

Figure-17: Magnetic field analogy for a
gravity wave generator to determine distant particle motion.
Vector,
V illustrates the motion and velocity of a cylindrical steel mass
exposed to a rotating pair of magnets.
The steel mass is exposed to the quadrupole moment generated by the
rotating pair of ceramic magnets.
The mass follows an elliptical orbit that is perpendicular to the axis of
the rotating pair of magnets.
|
The law of
gravitation is an inverse square law relationship as
are the laws relating the forces associated with monopole
static charges and dipole magnetism. In general the inverse
square law relates the intensity of a field effect to the
reciprocal of the square of the distance from the source of
the effect. The experiment illustrated in Figure-17 uses a
magnetic field analogy of a gravity wave generator to
demonstrate the effect quadrupole gravitational waves
have on spacetime and particle motion.
To demonstrate that dipole magnetic fields obey an inverse
square law relationship and therefore are a useful mechanism
to visualize quadrupole gravitational radiation for rotating
systems, Figure-15 demonstrates how force verses distance were
experimentally determined to generate the magnetic force
verses distance data presented in Figure-16. As expected
from field theory, dipole magnetism obeys the inverse square
law relationship. The following equation fits the force
verses distance data measured using the method illustrated
in Figure-15 where F = C/r^2 and
C = 1.786E5 dyne*mm^2. Because dipole magnetism
obeys the inverse square law it can be assumed the experiment
illustrated in Figure-17 is a reasonable analogy for the
gravity wave generator presented in Figure-14 where several
masses possessing mass and energy are rotated at
high speed. During operation the cylindrical mass in Figure-17 follows a
highly elliptical orbit indicating the presence of an
external magnetic quadrupole field. Therefore, to understand
how gravitational quadrupole radiation affects particle
motion the rotating magnetic field experiment in Figure-17
is useful.
It is well known and documented in the book Gravitation
and other text books
that rotating massive systems like a binary stars, black holes
and all rotating massive objects generate
gravitational waves due to the reduced quadrupole moment
of the rotating disturbance. Figure-18 illustrates how a
massive rotating system analogous to a binary star generate
gravitational disturbances in spacetime. Gravity waves are
generated by a rotating mass-energy system because the
differential arrival time from opposite sides of the system
cause a phase angle between gravitational vectors. Gravitational vectors from opposite sides of a
rotating system that initially oppose each other when the
system is stationary are drawn inclined at phase angle,
dq
during rotation. The amplitude of the resulting
gravitational wave generates a reduced quadrupole moment
that when squared is proportional to the generated
gravitational power. Further, it can be
shown that like electromagnetic waves, gravitational waves
have energy, U that delivers
momentum, p to a point in spacetime causing a small net force,
F to act at that point. The force, F is the net
gravitational wave force this research is attempting to
generate, enhance and measure.
Laboratory sized gravitational generators are not new
as illustrated by the simple design presented in the book
Gravitation by Thorne and Wheeler. Figure-20 solves the
example on pages 979 and 980
where the Gravitational-wave power output of a massive rotating beam
is computed when the beam rotation frequency is determined
by balancing centrifugal force and beam material tensile
strength. The power radiated in the form of gravitational
waves is a very small 2.27E-22 ergs/sec and the force
imparted to an area 500 meters away is only 1.89E-42
newtons. However, if the mass or the rotation rate of
the beam can are greatly increased then a form of gravity
propulsion (see below) may be possible.
GRAVITY WAVE PROPULSION - HYPOTHESIS:
The power output by a laboratory sized gravitational-wave
generator is very small unless the rate of rotation or the
mass of the beam is increased. However, it is hypothesized
that if the ordinary mass-energy of a rotating beam
is increased to that of the planet Jupiter and if the
rate of rotation is kept the same at 4.456 revolutions per
second it may be possible to impart a force of 28.5 newtons
to an object 500 meters away. Please see Figure-20 for the
basic methodology required for carrying out this analysis.
However, achieving the mass-energy density for
successfully conducting this experiment does not yet exist
on the planet Earth. But, it is encouraging that negative
energy of the same density may not be required.
FURTHER INVESTIGATION: Using the reduced quadrupole
moment of a rotating system deserves further investigation.
For example, the theoretical warp bubble illustrated in
Figure-3 was created using frame dragging and
not negative energy as required by Alcubierre's
warp bubble. While the
theoretical warp bubble illustrated in Figure-3 looks
similar to the negative energy warp bubble illustrated in
Figure-1 and Figure-2 the frame dragging warp bubble needs
to be more clearly understood to determine its true
physical characteristics. |

Figure-18: Reduced quadrupole moment
generation of gravitational waves through spacetime.

Figure-19: Method to approximate reduced quadrupole
gravitational-wave power

Figure-20: Example in the book
Gravitation to design a laboratory-sized gravitational-wave
generator.
(2) GRAVITY AND CURVATURE OF SPACETIME
TOP
According to Einstein's
General Theory of Relativity gravitation is a
manifestation of the curvature of spacetime. Light and
particles of matter travel along geodesics while the geometry
in
which travel occurs takes place in spacetime not just
space. A geodesic is the shortest line between two
points that lies in a given surface. In curved space two
separate geodesics that start off parallel will
eventually cross or intersect. Because gravity is a
manifestation of geometry this behavior will occur in
the motion of particles on geodesics in spacetime. The
intersection of initially parallel geodesics is an
expression of gravitational tidal effects while
traveling within a gravitational field. For example, two
particles in free fall in a gravitational field will
initially move parallel to each other as they approach
the ground. However, because the particles are moving on
radial paths to the center of the massive object they
will seem to move toward each other if the distance
traveled is great enough. This is a description of the
tidal effects of gravity and the spacetime effect on
particles moving in spacetime. This phenomenon is also
called geodesic deviation.
Figure-2 represents the gravitational field determined
using the Schwarzschild metric solution for the
curvature of spacetime outside any spherically
symmetric mass like the Earth, Sun or a black hole. The
tidal effects of gravity on a volume of space as the
volume approaches a massive object is displayed. Changes
of space-extension or distortion of the volume is caused by the
curvature of spacetime. |

Figure-1, Schwarzschild metric or line element for static,
spherically symmetric fields outside spherically
symmetric bodies. This equation describes the metric
structure of empty spacetime surrounding a massive body.

Figure-2, Volume entering the gravitational field of an object
modeled by the Schwarzschild solution
|
Furthermore,
the curvature of spacetime causes the path of a light ray
to bend in the region around a massive object. A ray of
light as it approaches the gravitational charge of a massive
object undergoes a deflection through the angle,
F
when the separation distance, D
is small enough. Using the Schwarzschild metric
solution given by the principle of equivalence the equation
for the deflection angle, F
of a ray of light is illustrated in Figure-3.
Several observations for the deflection of light by the Sun
during solar eclipses are in agreement with this simple
light ray deflection equation. |

Figure-3, Deflection of light determined by the Schwarzschild
metric
|
(3) TEST FOR FLATNESS
OF SPACETIME
TOP
Sometimes it's necessary to
determine the degree to which spacetime is curved. The
following test for spacetime flatness is useful to
determine if the influence of a nearby massive object can be
ignored when trying to determine the relative position of
two particles or two space ships in orbit. The following example
is from page 30 of Gravitation by Misner and Thorne.
Statement of the Problem: A region just above the
surface of the Earth, 100 m x 100 m x 100 m (space
extension) is followed for 10^6 m of light-travel time (T ~
3 seconds). Using the Riemann curvature tensor determine the
uncertainty of measurement for the volume as it traverses
the space around Earth. |

Figure-4, Example from Gravitation, page 30
|
(4) SPACETIME
CURVATURE
TOP
The following is a general
method or procedure to determine the non-relativistic
change in the space extension of a volume, region or object
in the vicinity of a massive object caused by tidal effects
of gravity and spacetime curvature. This example is useful
to determine the dimensions of an object as it approaches a
black hole or to determine when spacetime can be considered
Euclidian (flat) or non-Euclidian. |

Figure-5, Simple application of the Riemann curvature tensor
|
(5) GENERAL RELATIVITY THEORY AND APPLICATIONS
TOP
The following series of simple
analyses are applications of General Relativity to
the study of Cosmology. Gravity dominates on large scales
making it possible to neglect nuclear and electromagnetic
forces for cosmological approximations. In addition, the
universe is to a very high degree "homogeneous" (the same at
every point) and "isotropic" (the same in every direction) making the spacetime metric nearly the same from one
point to another over large distances. For more information
please see the references especially
Relativity Demystified. |

Figure-6, General Relativity theory and applications
|
6) EFFECTS OF DARK ENERGY ON COSMOLOGY
TOP
The cosmology presented here is based on the
concept of dark energy and the resulting negative
pressure required for an expanding universe. These
concepts are important because designing a warp drive
depends on dark energy or something similar to generate
the signature warp bubble required for faster than light
star
travel.
The following are plots of the scale factor (a), Hubble
parameter (H), energy density (r)
and expansion velocity (VH/c) of the universe as a function
of time from the Cosmic Microwave Background which occurred 380,000 years after the
Big Bang. Generating these Cosmology results require the
following equations from Sean M. Carroll's text book, SPACETIME and GEOMETRY
an Introduction to General
Relativity. The equations required for this analysis are: Scale
factor (a), equation 8.183 on page 367, Hubble parameter
(H), equation 8.184 on page 367 and average mass density (r) of the
universe, equation 8.67 on page 336. Equation 8.67 is the Friedmann equation
which relates spacetime curvature (K), mass density and the expansion rate
(H) of the universe. Using the Friedmann equation average mass
density of the universe is determined by substituting K = 0 because the universe is observationally flat
over great distances. Finally, the expansion velocity of the universe is
VH = H*(t/t0)*d,
where t0 is the present time from the CMB and d
is our present distance from the CMB. The CMB
is defined as the Cosmic Microwave Background which occurred
380,000 years after the Big Bang. |

Figure-7, Results for scale factor, Hubble
parameter, energy density and expansion velocity of the
universe as
a function of time from when the Cosmic
Microwave Background (CMB) occurred 380,000 years after the
Big Bang
EINSTEIN'S HYPOTENUSE
TOP

NASA CONCEPT OF AN ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY (1G) SPACESHIP
TOP

Figure-8, NASA concept for using artificial-gravity (AG) for
Mars exploration. R = 56m and 4 rpm.

Figure-9, Rotation radius of 56 meters and rotation rate of
4 rpm generates 1.0 g artificial gravity.

Figure-10, Free-body diagram illustrating how rotation
radius and rotation rate create gravity.
This concept illustrates equivalence between gravity
and normal acceleration.
REFERENCES FOR
GENERAL RELATIVITY
Gravitation, Charles W. Misner, Kip S. Thorne and John
A. Wheeler
SPACETIME and GEOMETRY An Introduction to General
Relativity, Sean M. Carroll
Relativity Demystified, David McMahon
Back to TOP
| MAIN PAGE | PRODUCTS
| CONSULTING | MISSION
| RESUME |
|
Web Site Design by John Cipolla/AeroRocket.com |
|